Search for: "Dean v. Dean" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:43 pm by Kent Scheidegger
UC Irvine Law Dean Erwin Chemerinksy has this op-ed in the NYT, titled "How the Supreme Court Protects Bad Cops. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
The question newly added in the petition is a sequel to the Court’s ruling two years ago in the case of Martinez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Liz Kramer
  (The court said the outcome would change if there were a basis to pierce the defendants’ corporate veil or an alter ego situation.)Dean v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
White House counsel and author of The Nixon Defense (Viking Adult), John Dean is interviewed, as well. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 9:21 am by Joy Waltemath
However, her religious discrimination and hostile work environment claims failed because the dean’s stray comment about “veiled cars,” his irritation over her absences, and criticism by a guest at a party hosted by the dean were not enough to support even a prima facie case on either type of claim (Shafer v The American University in Cairo, July 30, 2014, Caproni, V). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
At the Law Deans on Legal Education Blog, Richard Gershon (Mississippi) compares SEALS and AALS as conferences, identifying the pros and cons of each. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:44 pm
One is the comparison of challenges to prohibitions on same-sex marriage to challenges against bans on inter-racial marriage, which the Court put off deciding until Loving v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 6:34 am by Joy Waltemath
At that time, a dean at the hospital decided to create a new position, Vice President, who would head the department and to whom to the director would report. [read post]