Search for: "Doe Estates 1-10" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
If the lender does not hold a perfected lien, the bankruptcy trustee could claim the property as an asset of the bankruptcy estate and sell it in order to pay some of your debts. [read post]
If the lender does not hold a perfected lien, the bankruptcy trustee could claim the property as an asset of the bankruptcy estate and sell it in order to pay some of your debts. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:35 am
" The Commercial Activity Tax Fully phased-in on 4/1/09, the CAT is a broad-based, low-rate tax imposed on receipts from Ohio sources. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:29 pm
You should talk to a lawyer who knows about estate planning if this Will does not meet your needs. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:03 am by Nicolas Castillo, Managing CPA
  Finally, no conversation about investing in European real estate is complete without talking about the Golden Visa — which Spain does indeed offer. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
He is a New York City real estate developer, and he does not even have a good newspaper knowledge of what presidents can and cannot do with our highest office. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 6:08 am by Richard A. Morehouse
For example, assume a property listed on the tax roll for $1,000,000 sells on February 1, 2023, for $2,000,000. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:00 am by Richard A. Morehouse
For example, assume a property listed on the tax roll for $1,000,000 sells on February 1, 2023, for $2,000,000. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:39 am
The charity uses $30,000 each year to purchase a $1 million life policy on her life. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 5:52 pm
 It does not change when mitigation is required, but it does change where and how will be performed. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
They contend that Justice Hearn's biases were not sufficient to produce a "due process" (i.e., 14th amendment) violation, and so therefore it follows that not only does she not have to recuse herself, but that the litigants whose rights she violated have no right to ask that she recuse herself for the future, either (amicus brief, pp. 10-13 [Acrobat pp. 21-24]). [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
They contend that Justice Hearn's biases were not sufficient to produce a "due process" (i.e., 14th amendment) violation, and so therefore it follows that not only does she not have to recuse herself, but that the litigants whose rights she violated have no right to ask that she recuse herself for the future, either (amicus brief, pp. 10-13 [Acrobat pp. 21-24]). [read post]