Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 1941 - 1960 of 13,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1 .Family LLB 2. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 8:59 am
” (Presentation PDF pages 29, 59, and 28 respectively.) [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 12:43 pm by Cleve Clinton
Legally The City of Dallas “Earned Paid Sick Time” ordinance can be found at Dallas City Code Chapter 20, Article 1. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A.The applicant filed a request for re-establishment on November 29, 2011.The EPO informed the applicant that this request was late-filed because the cause of non-compliance within the meaning of R 136(1) had been removed on September 20.The applicant argued that the paralegals of the private practice had asked Dr. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:29 am
In re Dolce Vita Footwear, Inc., Serial Nos. 88554717 and 88554722 (April 29, 2021) [precedential] (Opinions by Judge Jyll Taylor). [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 10:45 am by Leiza Dolghih
Securitas removed Nicholson, without asking her for an explanation and without any investigation, and replaced her with a 29-year old employee. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 6:29 pm
App. 29 Jan. 2007), in an opinion by the great Judge Mathews (why do I fear that being praised by CAAFlog won't prove beneficial to Judge Mathews' career?) [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
One does not become a bencher to risk being associated with any failure that such innovation may bring. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[The content of this article is closely related to five of my previous posts on Slaw, dated: July 25, 2019; April 9, 2020; May 29, 2020; August 6, 2020; and, October 22, 2020. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by emagraken
 Deane-Cloutier says that although Rule 15-1 does not, on its face, contemplate settlement, neither did Rule 66(29), but that did not prevent the court from holding that the subrule applied to settlement of cases governed by the Rule. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  As a technical matter the Resolution does not satisfy Section 8(a)(1) of the WPR, which provides: SEC. 8. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:24 am
However, the legislature adopted as a compromise a new OCGA Section 9-11-12(j), relating to answers, defenses, and objections in civil practice, to read as follows: (j)(1) Stay of discovery. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:18 pm by Tanya Forsheit
Statement of the Article 29 Working Party Today, February 3, the Article 29 Working Party issued a statement. [read post]