Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 12,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
USC generally does two kidney transplant surgeries per week. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm
Vilches-Navarrete, 523 F.3d 1, 13 (1st Cir. 2008) (“As we have said before, the Fourth Amendment does not apply to activities of the United States against aliens in international waters. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:36 pm
Does that mean they’re not gay on Feb. 29? [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
In my judgment s.72(1)(c) means what it says. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:37 am
View Basel Committee finalises interim approach on regulatory treatment of accounting standards, 29 March 2017 [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
The board concludes therefrom that GSK Biologicals does not constitute an incorrect designation of the opponent. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
As I wrote in an earlier post, the new rules of civil procedure in British Columbia will come into effect on July 1, 2010.One of the changes will be to restrict the use of written interrogatories.Under the old rules, Rule 29 allowed any party to serve written questions on another party to the lawsuit. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:20 am
… The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:21 am
For judgment, please download: [2020] UKSC 29 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s press summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing please visit: Supreme Court website: 2 December 2019 morning and afternoon session To watch the judgment summary, please visit: Supreme Court website: 1 July 2020 [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
Here, the People do not allege that the sentence of incarceration of 1 to 4 years is illegal. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm
This third iteration takes 29-pages to address two motions: (1) A motion to reopen the evidentiary record to consider newly discovered evidence; and (2) A motion by the plaintiff to reconsider certain of the conclusions in the Court’s previous opinion. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:24 pm
The issues thus become: (1) Does Section (a)(2) authorize a plan participant to sue for recovery that would inure to his individual account rather than to the benefit of the plan as a whole? [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:29 pm
29. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
John Doe d/b/a Gnarly Sporting Goods Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00900-RLY-TAB File Date: Friday, June 29, 2012 Plaintiff: Indian Industries, Inc. d/b/a Escalade Sports Plaintiff Counsel: Charles Johnson Meyer, William A. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:01 pm
1. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
171(b)(1)? [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:01 pm
Moreover, the application was told that the application could be refused under A 97(1) EPC 1973 (now A 97(2)) if the deficiency was not overcome.[5] According to the Board, the objection pursuant to R 29(2) EPC 1973 (now R 43(2)) against the original claims 1, 18 and 22 was clear and unambiguous. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
’The Court ruled today as follows: "1. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm
Chappell12-5890Issue: (1) In Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities.[1] He is also an adjunct professor at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
