Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 5,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
NOTE: This article includes updated material to explain the impact of Public Act 98-511 (effective January 1, 2014) and Public Act 101-0027 (effective January 1, 2020). [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
If the statute does not so plainly state, then animals do not have statutory standing. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 7:08 am
In many cases, the DWI/DUI lawyer does not want the videotape to be used at trial since it will not paint a pretty picture of the state the individual was in when he or she was pulled over. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:34 am
An individual does not need to file a separate unemployment claim for FPUC. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 6:37 am
Why, then, does the NCMEC do it? [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
The firm does not contend that there is general or specific personal jurisdiction over the Carrascos. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
To comply with the Interpretation Act section 12(1) and CCA section 61(7) on 4 November 2015 The Crime and Courts Act 2013 (Commencement No. 14) Order 2015, signed on 27 October 2015 by Edward Faulks, Minister of State, Ministry of Justice, brought into force s.41 with Schedule 15 and s.42, as they related to sections 34-39. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
For example, the NCT entities that are named as Defendants here are: National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2003-1; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-2; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-3; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-4; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-1; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2; National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-3; and National Collegiate Student… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Last month, Righthaven finally had its day before the Ninth Circuit when it participated in oral arguments in two of its appeals (audio available here).1 These appeals almost didn’t happen. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:19 am
Does Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 5:32 am
G.S. 7A-39(b)(2). [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:53 am
Id., at 1. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:32 pm
It does not appear to deal with actions against employers or workers; they are covered by s-s (1). [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:39 am
In this discussion, the Court stated: “a state agency’s power to mitigate its project’s effects through voluntary mitigation payments is ultimately subject to legislative control; if the Legislature does not appropriate the money, the power does not exist” 39 Cal. 4th at 367, which the CSU relied upon in the current case. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 4:10 am
For the Court, this does not seem to be the case. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Schulte, “Patentgesetz mit EPÜ”, 8th edition, §39 PatG or A 76 EPC, respectively, marginal numbers 78, 79).Incidentally, the fact that the impugned patent has been amended does not alter [the situation] because in this case also the cut-off effect (Zäsurwirkung) of the act of grant cures possible formal errors and deficiencies that have occurred during the grant proceedings.This finding is not surprising. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
” The Court also found the text of Section 1252(f)(1) left no question that the Supreme Court does have jurisdiction to hear the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 7:52 am
The Rule 104(a) standard does not require perfection. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
But the failure to attend to this paperwork does not mean a new lawyer cannot act. [read post]
