Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 1,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 11:52 am
DC, No. 05-7188 In civil rights action brought after a police officer sustained serious neck and lower back injuries during a training program, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff's substantive due process rights were not violated; 2) he was not "seized" in violation of the Fourth Amendment; 3) the Police and Firefighters' Retirement and Disability Act bars his local law claims; and 4) the claims against the physician… [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
--An action under paragraph (1)(A) shall be governed under the rules and procedures set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United States Code. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
Plaintiff claims $1,857.30 for "Travel expenses for attorney West, including car rental, meals, lodging, laundry, DSL, copies," and $71.88 for "Office Supplies from Office Depot. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Yet on Aug. 20, a correction appeared stating that the attorney general does not represent OCA and that OCA has taken "no position" on the substantive issues the plaintiffs have raised. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:39 am
Nunnelley Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 444 Seabreeze Blvd., 5th Floor Daytona Beach, FL 32118-3951 Robert Wayne Holmes Assistant State Attorney Office of the State Attorney 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way Building D Viera, Florida 32940 Mark Schwab DOC #111129 Florida State Prison 7819 NW 228th Street Raiford, Florida 32026 Roger R. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
The recommendation prompted a dissent by a representative from the Attorney General=s Office. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) .................. 4 Johnson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Bagley, No. 04-4289Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over a meritless claim that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
In attendance were Mark Gruber, Peter Cannon and DaphneGaylord, Capital Collateral Re~ional Counsel for the Defendant, Ken Nunnelley andBarbara Davis, Office ofthe Attorney General and Wayne Holmes, Office of the StateAttorney. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
DeGennaro, No. 06-4195 Order holding that retrial of defendants would not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause and denying motions to bar retrial and dismiss the indictment is reversed where: 1) the decision of the trial court that there was "manifest necessity" to declare a mistrial was an abuse of discretion; and 2) a statement by counsel in support of a motion for mistrial, quickly reconsidered, does not preclude the defendant from claiming that the Double Jeopardy… [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 10:21 am
While courts generally hold that "[a]n attorney's inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause for the purposes of the Rule 4(m)," see, e.g., Howard v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 9:00 pm
Ed. 2d at 696, quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Fish and Wildlife Service are affirmed over claims that: 1) the Wild Bird Act does not apply to captive-bred birds; 2) the Act is unconstitutionally vague because it does not define the term personal pet; and 3) the jury instruction given by the trial court was incorrect. [read post]
