Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Question No. 5 Real Case: YES Citation: United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v . [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
Constitution, Amendment II For the first time in over sixty years, the United States Supreme Court will soon decide one of the most polarizing constitutional controversies: What sort of regulations on guns does the Second Amendment prohibit. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 12:13 am
In the instant case, the Court of Appeal held that there was no material evidence placed before the court to establish the change of name of the plaintiff-appellant company, and the resolution for change of name in Brazil that was provided before the court was deemed insufficient.[3] In Edicomsa International Inc and Associates v CITEC International Estates Ltd,[4] the plaintiff-appellant was a foreign company incorporated in the United States of America. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
It might be possible, as Andy Koppelman has argued, to strike down DOMA and uphold state bans on same-sex marriage if the Court applies the Romer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
United States and Yates v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:45 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Government Ordered to Respond to Restitution Issues in Fraud Case Against Newspapers' Workers
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:09 am
The United States has combined high gun ownership with long-term democratic stability, but that does not mean that guns promote tranquility. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 1:36 pm
This view eventually prevailed, resulting in the formation of the United States of America under the law of the United States Constitution. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
United States, the federal bank fraud case that was also argued last week. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
For speech to be protected by the first amendment of the United States Constitution, it must be pure opinion and not heard as stating facts. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:50 am
In assessing the constitutionality of the agreement, the Canadian Court found that the United States does not comply adequately with Article 33 of the UN Refugee Convention, which prohibits return to persecution, or Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture, which prohibits return to torture -- specifically naming the Maher Arar case as an example of the United States' failure to protect. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Unfortunately, it often does. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Ron DeSantis to accept state residents off Holland America cruise ships, USA Today (last updated April 2, 2020). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
” Given that, how does Norwood explain the popularity of tanning beds in the United States? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:27 pm
, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 9:33 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
HolderDocket: 10-545Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:31 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
