Search for: "Downs v. Jones" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 3:46 pm
Tribe noted that the Supreme Court had used that clause to slap down other laws. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
Google’s response was simply to close down Google News in Spain. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:15 am by Bob Ambrogi
So here are some of the random notes I jotted down, in no particular order. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
Lenawee County, Michigan, had an apocalyptic Christian nationalist militia problem about a decade ago. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The EU approach: Scarlet Extended SA v SABAM The EU’s digital agenda commissioner, Neelie Kroes, is the latest to add her voice to the anti-SOPA movement. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:15 am by Guest Blogger
 A clue may be found in a single sentence from the Supreme Court’s pivotal Jones & Laughlin Steel decision upholding the National Labor Relations Act against both commerce clause and liberty of contract claims. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:43 am
On the first complaint, the facts of the case line up very closely with the Universal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:50 am by CMS
It is delivered on a unanimous basis by seven Justices of the UK Supreme Court (including the two Scottish Justices, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge, together with the Northern Irish Justice, Lord Kerr, and Welsh Justice, Lord Lloyd-Jones). [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm by JD Hull
Simpson, Jim Jones, Ike Turner and, last but not least, Simon Cowell. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
If you scroll down you will see why teaching this class has been enormously rewarding. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
  Before moving on to the last item, I wanted to point out this Anita Lee story in the Sun Herald on the Jones v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
The court referred to the seminal case of Jones v Krok 1995 (1) SA 677 (A) to set out the conditions to be met for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment, namely: ‘(i) that the court which pronounced the judgment had jurisdiction to entertain the case according to the principles recognised by our law with reference to the jurisdiction of foreign courts (sometimes referred to as “international jurisdiction or competence”)? [read post]