Search for: "E Holder" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 11:18 am by Naomi Jane Gray
On Friday I had the privilege of speaking at the AIPLA Spring Meeting in Los Angeles on the subject of pre-1972 sound recordings and the current series of lawsuits brought by the successors of the Turtles against Sirius XM regarding royalties over pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Birss J's decision in the post-Svensson debateIn case 20th Century Fox and Others v Sky UK and Others, Birss J addresses last-generation torrent software Popcorn, which is worrying right holders all over the world. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:35 pm by Cyrus Farivar
" UPDATE Monday 10:19am CT: Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesman with the DOJ, e-mailed Ars the exact same statement. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We are very pleased to have Reuel E. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:30 am by Jani
[l]imiting the information provided by the third party by releasing only the name and residential address but not telephone numbers and e-mail addresses... [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 3:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
Exempts 271(e) (Hatch-Waxman and biosimilars) proceedings. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:05 pm by Scott R. Flick and Jessica Nyman
April 2015 Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 am by Marc Soss
The court began by noting that “property of the estate” has been “construed most generously” so that it includes “[e]very conceivable” interest of the debtor. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:10 am by Michael Geist
Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm by MBettman
A defendant’s recourse is to file a motion for a more definite statement under Civ.R.12(E). [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:15 pm by Barry Sookman
Ashcroft, 537 US 186 (2003), the U.S, Supreme Court noted that “longer terms would encourage copyright holders to invest in the restoration and public distribution of their works”. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
During that XX‐day period, FDA engages the NDA and ANDA holders in discussions regarding the potential for a label change. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 8:28 am by Glyn Moody
" But it then goes on to distinguish that situation from where "restrictions originate from contractual arrangements between right-holders and distributors (online service providers, broadcaster, etc.) [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 8:28 am by Glyn Moody
" But it then goes on to distinguish that situation from where "restrictions originate from contractual arrangements between right-holders and distributors (online service providers, broadcaster, etc.) [read post]