Search for: "EVANS v. STATE" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm by Isabel McArdle
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the… [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am by SHG
Evans, 514 U.S. 1, 11 (1994); United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 367… [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:34 am by Jon Sands
There was also no equitable tolling due to Evans v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:00 am by Brandon W. Barnett
The trial judge relied on an opinion out of the 5th Circuit, Meza v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm by NL
The Portugese Court had not been able to put the interests of the property owners and the tenant in the balance, the absolute terms of the law after the 20 year period were not per se incompatible with the Convention (Evans v UK [GC] App No 6339/05 at para 89, Salabaiku v France App No 10519/83 at para 28). [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm by NL
The Portugese Court had not been able to put the interests of the property owners and the tenant in the balance, the absolute terms of the law after the 20 year period were not per se incompatible with the Convention (Evans v UK [GC] App No 6339/05 at para 89, Salabaiku v France App No 10519/83 at para 28). [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]