Search for: "Ed Peters"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 6:39 am
” At the DealBook blog of the New York Times, Peter Lattman identifies several former Supreme Court clerks who have made their way to Wall Street. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:33 am
New York Times op-ed, One Nation, Two Deficits, by Peter Orszag (Director, Office of Management and Budget, 2009-10): The nation faces a nasty dual deficit problem: a painful jobs deficit in the near term and an unsustainable budget deficit over the medium and long term. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:17 am
Vincent Chetail, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, has published Vattel and the Semantics of International Law: A Critical Reconstruction (Vattel et la Sémantique du Droit des Gens: Une Tentative de Reconstruction Critique) in Vattel's International Law in a XXIst Century Perspective (Vincent Chetail & Peter Haggenmacher, eds., Brill) (forthcoming). [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
"Masterchef sets new standard for kids' TV" http://j.mp/bMVJor interesting op-ed piece in the new york times ... [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:41 am
“Sharon Shoesmith is free to appeal her failed attempt to overturn her sacking at the height of the Baby Peter affair, after a judge issued a scathing criticism of the conduct of former children’s secretary Ed Balls, and threw out all but a fraction of his claims for legal costs. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
– Ed.] [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:49 pm
(Hat tip: Peter Siegelman) [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:31 am
For years attorneys have complained- on this blog-to the chief judges- and amongst each other- about Peter Adrien. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 4:13 pm
Doug Berman at SL&P has this post on the op-ed. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:12 pm
Stephen Budiansky has published a New York Times op-ed critical of locavores’ math. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:21 pm
I have no doubt Judge Seff will land on her feet and find another calling in the law where she can use her experience and talent to improve the practice of law around her.And, now that Ed Newman has faced a serious opponent and has almost lost, will he change his ways on the 6th floor? [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:10 am
Samantha Ruiz-Cohen over Judge Peter Adrien. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:15 am
The post, part of the Capitol Hill publication’s “Pundits Blog”, is by Peter Fenn, head of a PR firm and someone who has worked extensively with Democratic candidates. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:35 pm
Rubin's The Law of Piracy(2d ed., 1998), and Ivan Shearer's Piracy article in the Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:51 am
Ed. 2d 619. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:47 am
Whitney Strub, Perversion for Profit: The Politics of Pornography and the Rise of the New Right Sheldon Krimsky and Tania Simoncelli, Genetic Justice: DNA Data Banks, Criminal Investigations, and Civil Liberties Alexander Tsesis (ed.), The Promises of Liberty: The History and Contemporary Relevance of the Thirteenth Amendment Laura Katz Olson, The Politics of Medicaid Stephanie Carvin, Prisoners of America’s Wars: From the Early Republic to Guantanamo Nancy Fraser, Scales of Justice:… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:01 pm
For those who are not familiar with the Blawg Review, it is a roving, weekly round up of the prior week's legal blogs expertly orchestrated by the anonymous Ed. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:50 pm
I (Rick Hills) am posting the following response to my earlier criticism of Peter Schuck's op-ed, e-mailed to me by Peter: "I am indeed surprised -- not that you disagree, but that you disagree without having read a book-length treatment of this issue: : Peter Schuck and Rogers M. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:15 am
Peter Schuck's op-ed on the Fourteenth Amendment and "soil citizenship" contains an interesting and important historical point, a possibly sensible policy suggestion -- and a really unpersuasive legal interpretation. [read post]
