Search for: "English v. State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 6,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:02 am
Yet that decision was dubious in light of Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Comment This was an ambitious appeal and its outcome is unsurprising given the weight carried by the open justice principle in English law. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am
Render v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Mauldin et al.[10] It was argued on the basis of the “full appreciation” test stated by the Court of Appeal in Combined Air Mechanical v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
Prosecution history estoppel has not been applied in English proceedings, and it remains to be seen whether that will change in light of Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:01 am
” [Deutsch v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:07 pm
Oct. 16, 2008) In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
The question arose again in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 5:51 am
by Dana Northcraft and Natalie Birnbaum Since Roe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:05 am
Mr Justice Birss observed in Illumina v MGI that a limiting definition of a feature in the description, limits the scope of the claim. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
V & J Foods, Inc., No. 07-1009 (7th Cir. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
This is due to the deliberate legislative choice, attaching significance in English law to testamentary freedom. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:30 am
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Subar v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:37 am
EEOC v. [read post]
