Search for: "Held v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 82,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm by stu@crimapp.com
On January 19th, 2011, the Court decided Harrington v Richter, Supreme Court NO. 09-587. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court reasoned that in N v United Kingdom (2008) 47 EHRR 39, the ECtHR held that a high threshold for violation of article 3 should be maintained. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
  The Court of Appeals also noted that the United States Supreme Court stated a “basic teaching of representative government … that elected officials represent all of those who elect them, and not merely those who are their neighbors," citing Dusch (387 US 112, Dallas County, Alabama v Reese (421 US 477) and Fortson v Dorsey, 379 US 433. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division held that Petitioner's claims were "unavailing", finding that Petitioner received advance notice of the charges, was provided a full evidentiary hearing, and he was represented by counsel at the hearing. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division held that Petitioner's claims were "unavailing", finding that Petitioner received advance notice of the charges, was provided a full evidentiary hearing, and he was represented by counsel at the hearing. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:21 am by Beth Graham
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
At its peak in 1912, Socialists held 1,200 public offices in 340 American cities, including 79 mayors in 24 states. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:51 am by The Federalist Society
On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 2:22 pm by Guest Author
”  The Court reiterated that formulation just six years ago (in Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:02 pm
Justice Souter filed a brief concurrence, printed here in its entirety: I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]