Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 7,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2018, 6:01 am
It is awkward because intelligence professionals have typically shied away from such sharp and, in the aggregate, one-sided public criticisms of a president. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 9:09 pm
The notion that such a safety valve was perceived as crucial by a White House official is not surprising. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
25, citing Reference re Public Schools Act (Man.), s. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
We wanted the Saudis to limit their public criticism of the Iran talks and to go along with them, however grudgingly. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 6:01 am
Section 7008 explicitly makes the restriction inapplicable to “assistance to promote democratic elections or public participation in democratic processes. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
At one time, we were expected to get about 6 inches of snow, but officials we unable to certify that statement as the weather tends change unexpectedly. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:04 pm
I think it is unconstitutional to say, "We're going to tell you you can go, but we're going to micromanage the war. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
One plaintiff, they note, was “censored” after she re-published a post by Robert F. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:45 pm
We're doing the Chinese a favor—presumably because the administration believes that will redound to our national interests in the long term. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Even in these partisan times, one would think there will be reverberations from having a respected conservative chief justice call out a cabinet official, acting at the behest of the president who appointed him, for lying to the public and the courts, including the Supreme Court, “from the time [Ross] entered office,” acting in “bad faith,” spinning a story that appears “contrived,” “incongruent” with what at least two departments,… [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:17 pm
And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 7:39 am
Without disclosing whether Third Coast charges different prices for various pot strains, or fees to facilitate transactions, their spokesperson said, “ultimately, we’re a private club, not a public store…” Well, good luck with that…While the decision no doubt spells hardship for those in the, er, budding industry, Jim Lynch of the Detroit News observes “Panicked Uncertainty”. [read post]
12 May 2017, 4:43 am
Subsequently, administration officials said Mr. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:47 am
That was the question in In re Lipsky. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
And with new leadership from Tanya Hughes, we’re seeing more public outreach through programs, newsletters and even a new blog developed by interns (and which has a nicer splash page than this one….). [read post]
9 May 2019, 12:06 pm
In case you’re unfamiliar with this terminology, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Missouri v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am
The parties' decision not to file the Agreement is immaterial. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:45 pm
This creates a perverse incentive for law enforcement to make decisions that maximize their profits instead of maximizing public safety. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Do I need to re-apply? [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 7:46 am
It's a business decision of some kind. [read post]
