Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 1941 - 1960 of 30,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
Enjoy: This may be more helpful (though not a lot): Finally, we have In re: Valerie White, which isn’t an “admin law” case but does raise interesting “civ pro” issues: Interesting [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 2:35 am by Aaron L. Nielson
Enjoy: This may be more helpful (though not a lot): Finally, we have In re: Valerie White, which isn’t an “admin law” case but does raise interesting “civ pro” issues: Interesting [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Start w/question of strict liability v. blanket immunity; look at possible regimes; map out core elements of 512, DSA, and 230. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 12:32 pm by Josh Blackman
The government argues that no genuine circuit conflict exists, but it does so only by ignoring the Second Circuit's reasoning in City of New York v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:25 am by Administrator
It does not attract criminal liability. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
See, e.g., In re S’holders Data Corp., 495 F.2d 1360, 181 USPQ 722, 723 (CCPA 1974) ("Although the Act does not define 'goods,' the definition of a 'trademark' in section 45 declares that it is used 'to identify goods' and section 2 refers to 'goods in commerce.'"). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
It doesn't really screen out anyone, and to the degree it does, its only effect is on people with conscience like Ms. [read post]