Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 5,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2010, 3:16 pm
Because even if you're bigger than them, a gun -- or the threat of a gun -- is a great equalizer.Both sides should be happy this didn't turn out worse than it did. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm
All the way to the Appellate Division.So the question is whether the Vehicle Code, which says you have to be "properly restrained by a seat belt," is satisfied when you're restrained only by a lap belt. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:55 pm
His license gets confiscated by the officer and immediately suspended, which is okay under 13353.2 (since he's got a .04), but then he requests a hearing at which he says that they're not allowed to take his license permanently since he didn't have a .08 as required by 13557.So what do you do? [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:41 am
Appellant pulled out a gun from under his shirt, "put it in [Davis's] face," and said, "You're fucked. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:53 pm
You may wonder why we're here. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:53 am
Unless you're totally bored and there's nothing else to do. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 2:34 pm
And then we should forthrightly put that into the mix and decide, rather than pretending that as long as a school is "good", they're equal.POSTSCRIPT - Full disclosure. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:16 pm
But they're technically private. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:52 pm
" Nice poker reference.That said, if you're going to slam an attorney for not adequately supervising a clerk, you might want to make extra sure that the opinion in which you do so doesn't have similar clerk-induced errors. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Cal.).] [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:03 am
Cal.) [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 4:11 pm
They're taxed.Regardless, Justice Richman walks the reader through the various statutory details and definitions. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 12:22 pm
Cal. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:30 pm
Cal. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
Among other things, the court of appeal held that the California Supreme Court's recent decision in In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th 298 (2009) (“Tobacco II”) did not mandate reversal of the trial court's decision. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:54 am
Cal. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Cal., Apr. 06, 2009) Ring Tone companies and class action plaintiffs are splitting up rowdy fans (read: judges) across the country, from California to Wisconsin. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:54 pm
In re OpenAI ChatGPT Litigation (N.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 1:31 pm
They're trying to see if a bowel is obstructed, a bone in broken, a heart is swollen, etc. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:57 am
So we’re here and ready to proceed with the trial, and I intend on going through with the trial. [read post]
