Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 10:30 am by Jack Goldsmith
  Such re-engineering will require time, but it is precisely on point insofar as remote takeover means attacker input being processed by a target. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 8:38 am by Buce
Re "the base" in particular:  The Reagan fanbase (to draw a contrast) is well remembered, partly because they're still with us, and they love to talk about it. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:34 pm
In today’s In re Guardianship of Kennedy (Iowa Apr. 18, 2014), a mother — the legal guardian of her 20-year-old “intellectually disabled” son — decided that her son should get a vasectomy, and had a doctor perform it. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am by Kristen Fries
JUSTICE KENNEDY: So the fact that the computer is involved, it seems to me, is necessary to make it work. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:34 am by Jeff Foust
“When you start talking about the kinds of missions we’re talking about, numbers of launches required adds to the complexity and the risk incurred,” Bolden said. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Marshall Majority Rulings (Roberts, CJ, with Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas & Alioto, JJ joining):“Core” or “Noncore” under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Judge Scalia is still on the Supreme Court;  one of the justices joining the majority, Judge Kennedy, is also still on the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 3:57 pm by Lowell Brown
“Douglass was constantly telling him, ‘You’re not doing everything I want you to do,’ and eventually they became really good friends. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:18 pm by Fabrizio di Piazza
The norm is that they’re generalist Justices. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm by Gene Quinn
All you’re talking about is ­­ if I can use the word ­­ an “idea. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
Kennedy, J put it thus in a different context from the present in an oft cited dictum in R v London Borough of Hillingdon, ex p Tinn (1988) 20 HLR 305 at p 308: “As a matter of common sense, it seems to me that it cannot be reasonable for a person to continue to occupy accommodation when they can no longer discharge their fiscal obligations in relation to that accommodation, that is to say, pay the rent and make the mortgage repayments, without so straining their resources as to… [read post]