Search for: "In re J. C."
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
The task of judges in relation to the ‘enormous challenges’ that have been thrown up by the internet was identified by Sir James Munby P in Re J (A Child) [2013] EWHC 2694 (Fam): The law must develop and adapt, as it always has done down the years in response to other revolutionary technologies. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
J., dissenting). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:23 pm
Section 350--j provides in pertinent part as follows: 1. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am
Quoting Walton J in Burston Finance Ltd v Speirway Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 1648 at 1652B-C, the principle of subrogation was outlined as such: “[W]here A’s money is used to pay off the claim of B, who is a secured creditor, A is entitled to be regarded in equity as having had an assignment to him of B’s rights as a secured creditor. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:33 pm
We're Associates Company v Cohen, Stracher & Bloom, P.C., 65 NY2d 148. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Most proxy access bylaws address, in some form, the following issues: (a) ownership threshold, (b) length of ownership, (c) maximum number of stockholder nominated candidates, (d) calculation of qualifying ownership, including treatment of “loaned” shares, (e) stockholder group limit, (f) maximum number of access nominees, (g) notice deadlines, (h) future disqualification of stockholder nominees, (i) voting commitments, and (j) third-party compensation… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 3:28 pm
§ 365(c)(1). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 3:24 pm
§ 365(c)(1). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
H/t: Daniel J. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:10 am
J. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
A reserved judgment is awaited in the fourth, Sobrinho v Impressa Publishing, heard on 7 to 9 December 2015 by Dingemans J. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:58 pm
Scheck and Peter J. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Rather than mechanize manual research, the real challenge is to re-examine the very ground on which we stand. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that this exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 6:38 am
From the OED: c. intr. orig. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 6:06 pm
Vos babillards apprécieront, j’en suis certain! [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
The wording of the condition in the Annex (Annex E to Schedule J) of the TPP practically tracks the wording of Subsection 31.1(5). [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:09 pm
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KJE8780 .M87 2015Cian C. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Autorité des marchés financiers c. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
ICE, 3:12-CV-272-J-32JBT (M.D. [read post]
