Search for: "In re Sullivan "
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 342-45 (1980). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:21 am
Sullivan & Cromwell: S&C announced a whopping eight (8!) [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal ‘Fat Leonard’ Goes on the Lam Weeks Before Sentencing in Navy Bribery Scandal Portland Press Herald – María Luisa Paúl (Washington Post) | Published: 9/6/2022 The Malaysian defense contractor who pleaded guilty to bribing Navy officials with sex parties, fancy dinners, and alcohol in a corruption scandal has escaped just weeks before his sentencing date. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:48 am
Sullivan & Cromwell (Law firm) The Villages (“Florida’s friendliest retirement hometown? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:27 am
Sullivan & Cromwell (Law firm) The Villages (“Florida’s friendliest retirement hometown? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Sullivan & Cromwell (Law firm) The Villages (“Florida’s friendliest retirement hometown? [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:04 am
In the modern era, incumbent Presidents tend to be re-elected. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
(May depend on what you mean by governance.)Glynn Lunney, Tulane University Law SchoolThe Right of Publicity and the First Amendment: A Fundamental Re-Examination1A seems like a convenient savior from overbroad IP. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Today's decision in National Institute of Family & Life Advocates v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
FDA says: we’re still the arbiter; proceed at your own risk. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
They’re all expressive. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 3:00 am
That this law may be a direct encroachment on fundamental human rights and principles of justice has been discussed elsewhere (Sullivan, Mullen, & Pathe, 2005). (1) These ethical, moral and political arguments aside, the specific nature of the Victorian Serious Sex Offender Monitoring Act leads to considerable debate about its appropriateness and creates a number of issues on public policy, theoretical, practical and clinical levels. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Again, that sounds like a field preemption argument to us.And we know there are lots and lots more of these types of cases than just the few cited in the petition, because they're in Bexis' book. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Sullivan, three Justices (Black, Douglas, and Goldberg) would have completely rejected libel law, at least as to statements on matters of public concern (whatever precisely that means). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
"Plaintiffs had the benefit of the [bankruptcy] trustee's report," Sullivan said. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:09 am
“We’re not going to engage in hypotheticals about what comes down the line, and the reports that purport to describe the president’s thinking are uninformed speculation,” Sullivan said. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
Seating is limited, however, so if you’re planning to attend, please make your reservations early. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
Sullivan, a government speech doctrine case, but something else. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Agarwal and Khrystina McMillan of Lax O’Sullivan Lisus Gottlieb. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Most everyday citizens won’t encounter the Commonwealth Court unless they’re suing the government or if they’re appealing a workers’ compensation or unemployment decision. [read post]
