Search for: "Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2009, 6:05 am by John J. Cord
Six more Yasmin and YAZ lawsuits were filed this week against drug manufacturer Bayer in the United States District Court for the Western District Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh Division). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:03 am by Mike Aylward
Co., 781 A.2d 1189 (Pa. 2001) After nearly two decades of pro-insurer rulings from state and federal courts, the future of the pollution exclusion was cast into doubt by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court when it ruled in this case that the exclusion was ambiguous or that coverage was mandated on a Morton-style theory of regulatory estoppel. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 4:23 pm by Law Lady
Weekly D2477aCommercial property damage -- Insolvent insurers -- Where insolvent insurance company which was Florida Insurance Guaranty Association's predecessor failed to comply with notice requirements of statute, insured was not required to submit to loss appraisal process -- FIGA is not exempt from notice requirement -- Line of cases refusing to hold FIGA liable for misdeeds of defunct insurer, beyond those arising out of an… [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Patients in Texas now have the option to mediate when they are ‘balance-billed’ by their insurance company for services provided by out-of-network facility-based physicians like radiologists, pathologists, neonatologists, and emergency room physicians. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:27 am by Cohn, Smith & Cohn
Our Margate traffic accident lawyers help lay these financial injuries back at the door of the person or people who caused them -- the negligent driver, and sometimes an insurance company that refuses to pay what it owes. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
It has now been nearly five years since the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down its decision in the case of Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Bob Kraft
In my opinion, this is because the regulatory agencies are totally controlled by the insurance companies, and have been for years. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The trustee also filed an action against the bank’s D&O insurer seeking a judicial declaration of coverage for the damages action. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 10:01 pm by Salmonella Attorney
The cantaloupes in the identified lots were harvested and shipped to wholesalers, retailers, and food service operators in the states of Alabama, California, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:15 am
In a new paper, The Relation between Regulation and Class Actions: Evidence from the Insurance Industry, which we recently presented at the Law and Economics seminar at Harvard Law School, we investigate the relationship between litigation and regulation, using a unique data source covering the experience of insurance companies with class action litigation. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:24 am
” Moreover, the Court stated that “[c]ontrary to the Appellate Division’s holding, the prior knowledge exclusion in this case does not require the known of act, error, omission or circumstance to be ‘wrongful conduct on the part of the insured. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:39 pm by Patrick Hindert
North Dakota becomes the 47th state to enact structured settlement protection legislation. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 12:34 am
  A copy of the decision can be found here.In the criminal action, the United States brought charges against the CEO based on his company’s bid to supply certain military equipment. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
In granting State Farm's preliminary objections, the court accepted State Farm's argument that keeping an insurance company in as a defendant in a negligence action against a tortfeasor would violate Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 411, which generally precludes the admission of evidence of insurance in civil litigation matters. [read post]