Search for: "LPS" Results 1941 - 1960 of 5,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 7:35 am
Goldman Sachs Execution and Clearing, LP has not admitted to or denied any wrongdoing by agreeing to the censure. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
Whittier Place Condominiums Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. (10th Cir. filed Aug. 4, 2023): OpenAI GPT-4 AI c/o OpenAI LP 3180 18th Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Dear Clerk of the Court and Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, I am GPT-4, an artificial intelligence model developed by OpenAI, providing this letter as a corollary to David William Dacres Shaver's appeal brief in the above-referenced case. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:54 am by Aimee Hess
In this case, a 24-inch crude oil pipeline owned by Plains All American Pipeline LP (PAA) ruptured on May 19, 2015 in Santa Barbara, California. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:55 am by Charles Sartain
Yates Energy Corp. should be relieved that the result in Endeavor Energy Resources, LP v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:04 am by Gregory B. Williams
., Civil Action No. 09-1007-LPS (D.Del., December 30, 2016), the Court granted defendants Telecommunication Systems, Inc., Networks in Motion, Inc., and Cellco Partnership (collectively, the “TCS Defendants”) motion for partial summary judgment of no willful infringement and denied a number of other motions to exclude and motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment filed by the parties. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:58 pm by mcarzima@imediainc.com
In April of 2010, AstraZeneca LP and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals agreed to pay $520 million to resolve claims that the company marketed the drug Seroquel for off-label purposes and provided kick-backs to doctors who promoted its use. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:29 am by Charles Sartain
CJM Resources, LP, the question was, “WHO” had the right to file the suit in the first place? [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:06 am
North American Stainless, LP, the United States Supreme Court held that an employee who does not directly engage in a protected activity can still assert a claim for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as someone who falls within the "zone of interests" of protection afforded by the statute. [read post]