Search for: "Lawrence v. Lawrence" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
H-Net adds some interesting reviews this week, including one of David V. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Surveillance video and hearing testimony obviates earlier determination that workers' compensation benefit claimant suffered a "permanent total disability"Santangelo v Seaford U.F.S.D., 2018 NY Slip Op 06838, Workers' Compensation Law §114-a, "Disqualification  for  false  representation," provides for the disqualification of a claimant from receiving future wage replacement benefits pursuant to §15 of said law if he or she is found to… [read post]
2 May 2015, 1:47 am by Ben
The Appeals Court decision in Blurred Lines is keenly awaited by many.More on Billboard here , Williams v Bridgeport Music, Inc, No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
”Hence my comment: In the currency of Lawrence Kohlberg’s stages of moral development (after Piaget), Trump’s moral (and psychological) development is thus arrested at the “pre-conventional” level of moral reasoning (Kohlberg noted that this could be found among some adults; it is also a level that happens to be immune from Carol Gilligan’s critique), although I would hesitate to use the adjective “moral” in both cases, for it strikes me as… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Surveillance video and hearing testimony obviates earlier determination that workers' compensation benefit claimant suffered a "permanent total disability"Santangelo v Seaford U.F.S.D., 2018 NY Slip Op 06838, Workers' Compensation Law §114-a, "Disqualification  for  false  representation," provides for the disqualification of a claimant from receiving future wage replacement benefits pursuant to §15 of said law if he or she is found to… [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:56 pm by Larry
Back in 2020, we covered National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:38 pm by Howard Bashman
Lawrence Hurley of NBC News has an article headlined “From IVF to birth control, Supreme Court abortion pill case could spark challenges to other drugs; The pharmaceutical industry warns that if courts can second-guess FDA approval of drugs, cases could arise on other contentious issues including vaccines, birth control and hormone therapy. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor, heard 12 – 14 November 2013. [read post]