Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
One can easily agree with Lord Justice Buxton, and as he further states, 'use' should entail a more active component than just passively placing in in a sphere where it is easily accessed from, even by accident. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:35 am
The Supreme Court ruled in 1965, in Griswold v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
The House of Lords held that the City Council was entitled to regard the applicants as homeless under section 175 (3) of the 1996 Act, but nevertheless to leave them there for a limited period. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
Meanwhile, the Press Gazette reported a bizarre attack on the Royal Charter by Lord Lester who apparently regarded it as outrageous because some people that he talks to have confused it with the Star Chamber. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm
X v UK is inconsistent with other more persuasive authorities like Airey v Ireland, Steel & Morris v UK (2005) 41 EHRR 22, and W v UK (1988) 10 EHRR 29 which, significantly, is a family law authority. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
From the Kentucky Supreme Court, in Sevier v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:04 pm
Bruce Lord Wilder Freedom of Speech in the United States from The Federalist to McCutcheon v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm
A Parliamentary Privilege (Defamation) Bill prepared by Lord Lester QC has been introduced in the House of Lords. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
. -- then imagine what it's like in a state prison.Why read Lord of the Flies when you can get a similar, nonfictional recitation from the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
In Din v Wandsworth LBC [1983] AC 657, the House of Lords had, by a majority, held that the correct date for determining intentionality was the date when the household left their accommodation. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
In State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:36 am
Regina v, Crawley, et al., Court of Appeals, May 21, 2014. [read post]
