Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 1:31 am
After X, C, D, D, A, B and C, we tragically have a face and a name attached to the failure of the legislature to respect and protect women’s rights in Ireland. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm
., the lack of an initial sound) and 21 consonants: b, p, m, f, d, t, n, lz, c, s, zh, ch, sh, r g, k, h, j, q, x The boldfaced, underlined consonants pose a challenge for the native speaker of English, but later I'll explain a way to think about them that I find useful. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
i.andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Suitability The sale of unsuitable investments is actionable under Rule 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act ofandnbsp; 1934, SEC Rule 10b-5.andnbsp; This body of law is premised, in part, on the New York Stock Exchange Rule 405- andldquo;Know Your Customerandrdquo; rule, and is also set forth in FINRAandrsquo;s Conduct Rule IM-2310, which states that:andnbsp; andldquo;In recommending to a customer the… [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
Relying principally on certain obiter dicta in Nicholas v Nicholas [1984] FLR 285, Moylan, J. made this order. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 3:44 am
36C-8A-802. c. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:10 am
B. and C. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
When the demand did not prompt a response, defendant on April 22, 2008 moved to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:13 am
A Protectionist Country Blocks Two More Big Deals, Petronas Rejection Casts Doubt on CNOOC $15.1 Billion Bid, Market braces for Petronas fallout, Mulcair Slams Feds on Handling of Petronas Deal, Petronas Deal on Hold Not Dead. ____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences … [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
Disgruntled investors;j. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm
Arguably a Wigmore sort of privilege might apply [see Spence J.'s discussion of qualified privilege in Slavutych v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 7:05 pm
____________________ For more information about our regulatory law services contact us: contact For more regulatory law updates follow us on Twitter: @CanadaAttorney Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences Preferences § 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] Return capslock a s d f g h j k l ; ‘ \ shift ` z x c v b n m , . / shift English Deutsch Español Français … [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 12:14 am
The facts of the subject matter jurisdiction question are very similar to J. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 12:14 am
The facts of the subject matter jurisdiction question are very similar to J. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 1:52 pm
If, after reviewing this information, they are unable to articulate the standard of care in my community, no matter what their other qualifications may be, they are not allowed to testify in North Carolina. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Shoss, Jason C. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Sivarama Krishnan (1995) Cri L J 1384 (Ker). [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
The bank also filed a complaint against the company, its Managing Director and the officials of Andhra Bank for diverse offences, namely, Section 120-B read with Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
§ 1506.2(b), and Laguna Greenbelt v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
(b) DETERMINING PROCEDURE. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm
Lewis J. [read post]
