Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2025, 2:51 am
In these days of federal attacks on private DEI, maybe some private universities might find this useful as a strategy for fighting back against the Trump Administration! [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am
The inquiry will examine the following regulatory issues: The management and administration of the charity by its trustees. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Client information needs to be protected; therefore, attorneys should avoid putting data such as social security numbers, dates of birth and addresses into these AI systems. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
It may also have significant safety consequences. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:08 pm
The application, for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 41, 44, 45, covers such gems as “advertising; business management; business administration; office functions” in Class 35 and, more worrying for those of our readers who can expect to face further competition, “legal services; security services for the protection of property and individuals; personal and social services rendered by others to meet the needs of individuals” in Class 45. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
The Office emphasized that this change is needed in light of the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm
The Agricultural Adjustment Act, famously upheld by the Supreme Court in Wickard v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:37 am
In 1981, Congress enacted section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act, which provides states with a Medicaid financed alternative to institution-based care. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:15 am
Here is the column: In their historic ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:44 am
Social media companies will now be under no obligation to remove legal content that may cause harm, such as content that promotes eating disorders and self-harm. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
As this term’s decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
From Pryor v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:20 am
Union, Local 25 v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
In so doing, McCarthy ignored the concerns of federal prosecutors and Capitol police that the release of certain footage may reveal information, such as camera angles and escape routes, that could weaken security and leave the Capitol vulnerable to future attacks. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm
The process of putting in place the administrative arrangements is continuing. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:45 am
V. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
., et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:29 am
And in 1896, the Court in Plessy v. [read post]
