Search for: "Michigan v. United States"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2013, 6:55 am
[citing Smith v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:21 am
United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:21 am
United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:14 pm
United States, dealt with the authority of police officers to detain those who leave a residence that officers have come to search.In an earlier case, Michigan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:30 am
Here is the abstract:Both the majority and concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:24 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:56 am
The suit (United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 am
The case is Evans v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:54 am
The issue in Bailey stems from a prior ruling issued thirty-one years ago, Michigan v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 1:44 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State Farm Mutual Automobile… [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
Perry, and twenty-six topside amicus briefs (not including that of the Court-appointed amica) have been filed in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:47 am
” In addition, the court noted that its decision would permit it to avoid the constitutional question whether applying the 2010 amendment retroactively would violate the Contracts Clauses of the United States and Michigan Constitutions. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 7:30 am
See Settlement Agreement, Ahmed v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
State Street Ann Arbor, Michigan (MI) 48198 (Washtenaw County); Copyright 2012 by Kurt Koehler [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:35 am
Fteja v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 4:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
