Search for: "Mrs Jones" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Decisions Below The Special Commissioners (Mr J Gordon Reid QC and Dr John F Avery Jones CBE) decided the First Issue in favour of Scottish Widows and the Second Issue in favour of HMRC so that HMRC were successful overall. [read post]
Decisions Below The Special Commissioners (Mr J Gordon Reid QC and Dr John F Avery Jones CBE) decided the First Issue in favour of Scottish Widows and the Second Issue in favour of HMRC so that HMRC were successful overall.  [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
Editor's Note:  This is the second installment in a series written by John Munsell of Miles City, MT, who explains how the small meat plant his family owned for 59 years ran afoul of USDA's meat inspection program. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:37 pm by Kris Maher
I want to sue Massey on behalf of myself for what they did,” said Mr. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:18 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“Speculation regarding certain characteristics of the spores is just that — speculation,” Mr. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Friday 7 October 2011, Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down judgment in the case of Adelson v Anderson ([2011] EWHC 2497 (QB)) striking out a libel action which had been served in March 2006 and where there had been a delay of 3 years since the last substantive steps in the action. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Can neighbours sue for historic contamination? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am by Conor McEvily
  Reporting on the argument, Adam Liptak of the New York Times observes that “several justices seemed inclined to find a way to help Mr. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by David Smith
Experts As Witnesses Slightly surprisingly, the MR kicked off this part of his speech by confessing to his surprise at the decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney, although he quickly recovers to say that he considers it to be the right decision. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm by David Smith
Experts As Witnesses Slightly surprisingly, the MR kicked off this part of his speech by confessing to his surprise at the decision of the Supreme Court in Jones v Kaney, although he quickly recovers to say that he considers it to be the right decision. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:32 pm
 For instance, if Joe Jones wanted to trademark JOE JONES for his restaurant, he would have to acquire a high level of distinctiveness and provide evidence that the public readily associates his name with restaurant services. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:23 pm by Writing Clinic
The plaintiff must establish duty, breach, causation, and damages.After the transfer, Mr. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]