Search for: "On Lee v. United States"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
The Court specifically held that Johnson had signed the application and could not avoid the consequences of the deficiencies in his disclosure even if he had not read the application and documents, citing Lee v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Lee Smith Publishers LLC. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:00 am
Ellen V. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
Image link above ~~~~~~~~~~ Attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941 Click on underlined “hot-links” Cemetery Watchmen Ashes found in trash led to proper burial LISTEN, REFLECT, and PRAY MANSIONS OF THE LORD – United States Military Academy Mens Glee Club THE NAVY HYMN – United States Naval Academy Mens Glee Club ECHO TAPS – United States Marine Corps Band ~~~~~~~~~~ Captain William Edward Nordeen,… [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:00 am
U.S. v Averette (1970) significantly changed its applicability, as the Court of Military Appeals decided that the UCMJ only applied to civilians in times of formally declared war. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Internationalism and Where United States Courts Should Find International Law. 24 Penn St. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:33 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
Florida (10-1139), raising the issue of whether a state government interferes with foreign policy by barring state college professors from using any funds to visit Cuba or any other “terrorist state”; and Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:31 am
There are eight cases in which the United States or a federal official is a party, with Justice Kagan recused, plus one Second Circuit case, with Justice Sotomayor recused. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 11:59 am
As with the original Summit experts from Australia, China, Hong Kong, (special administrative region of China), Japan, Korea (South), the United States of America and, the United Nations participated. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:20 am
Brian had dual citizenship in the United States and Canada. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
Another is U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
However, before State Street Bank v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
This has gone through a few iterations, ranging from the remarks of a government official in 2007 suggesting that corporate clients of their firms might want to rethink being clients there to the efforts in 2010 to suggest that Gitmo lawyers were disloyal to the United States. [read post]
