Search for: "People v. Davis" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The jury system as understood in America seems to me as direct and extreme a consequence of the dogma of the sovereignty of the people as universal suffrage. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
Some of the most dignified, loyal and trustworthy people we know haven't worn a suit in years and have long hair and multiple tattoos. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Ruth, an entertainment lawyer with Lassiter, Tidwell, Davis, Keller & Hogan PLLC from Nashville, TN, recommended William Patry’s post on the subject. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:21 am by WSLL
He testified he had sold methamphetamine to different people probably forty to fifty times. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
When people see the red sole on the street they think Louboutin. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
(84) Pittsburgh: People were going for DSTs early, so I joined the bandwagon. 10 [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(We all remember how a tight timeline affected the quality of judicial work product in complicated election matters in Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Wenninger’s article The VW Diesel Emissions Scandal and the Spanish Class Action is cited in the following article: Richard Marcus, Revolution v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
The Schwab case represents the latest showdown over whether pending executions should be postponed until after the Supreme Court has heard and decided the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Take, for example, last week’s oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Salazar v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
McKinney School of Law; Visiting Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law Dan Svantesson - Professor and Co-Director, Centre for Commercial Law, Faculty of Law, Bond University, Australia Agenda: Black letter jurisdiction law can seem poorly suited to the questions that face courts in cases about global content deletion. [read post]