Search for: "People v. Fair"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 10,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:14 am
See Thomas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:16 am
Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.Whether disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 12:30 pm
Bosede v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
People can see it on their retina displays. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:08 am
The Govan Law Centre has today accused the Scottish Legal Aid Board of denying access to justice to one of its clients in a bank charges case after SLAB refused for a second time (after an internal appeal) to fund the case (Sharp v Bank of Scotland) with civil legal aid. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
” [37] He then describes the magic in buying pieces that people really do not like.[38] Though the magic felt towards his work is tainted by his own daughter who hates him.[39] The legal battle is far from over, but to this author Hubert is not King Lear, but rather the King of Collecting. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
Obviously that is not worth the time and money for a lot of people. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:04 pm
" Ty Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 6:40 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:43 am
The court adopted the reasoning of the Second Circuit’s decision in Strubel v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:09 am
In other words, Courts must strike a balance between what the law provides, and what choices people should be allowed to make for their own lives. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm
As noted in People v Paul, whether a foundation for the experience and training is set forth or not, it seems that, as a matter of fundamental fairness, defendant should not have to proceed to trial in a narcotics case unless and until a laboratory report has been filed by the People. [read post]
