Search for: "People v. Harris"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2010, 12:01 pm
Angle v Reid This to me is a no brainer. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:45 am
Here’s one more quote, from one more judge, that seems appropriate; Harry Blackmun’s 1994 dissent in Callins v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:50 pm
Harris, Robert D. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:52 pm
Lightbourne's attorney, Susan Myers Keffer, said other states have less secrecy and that Florida should be more open about who's sticking needles into inmates. ''We don't know these people's personnel records and their employment. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
Some people think, in Utah at least, that the firing squad is the most humane because it's just one bullet to the head - it's quick. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:14 am
However, in Bates v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm
In March, in Lindke v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:37 am
… I don’t like to badger people. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 am
’” It is time for Professor Cohen to be educated, and I am happy to do it: In the subtle sexism case of Hopkins v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:19 am
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Harry S Truman Scholarship Foundation .................... [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:02 am
I think not, as he uses his point to question the Supreme Court's Scott v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am
Nor was Brennan, although he was both able and influential, as indeed was Stevens—until he wrote a ridiculous opinion in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Harris, Book Note, Reviewing Roger I. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
Hence Illinois unquestionably had jurisdiction over [petitioner]'s petition.[22] Furthermore, the court can still rule on grounds for dissolution of marriage even if the petitioner has not satisfied the 90-day residency requirement.[23] In Hermann v Hermann, 219 Ill [read post]
