Search for: "People v. House"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 12,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
During the Reconstruction Era, the House and Senate refused to seat people on the basis of Article I, section 5, clause 1, which provides that "[e]ach House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:01 pm
US v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:20 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 10:35 am
People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:39 am
State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:51 am
It involves the applicability of article 8 to local authority evictions in two contexts: first, introductory tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, part V and tenancies excluded from security of tenure provisions under the Housing Act 1985, Part IV (rights relating to secure tenants) by para 4 of Sch 1 to that act. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:13 am
Katz v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
The post The Overlooked appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm
The post The Overlooked appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:00 am
” They testified that there are too many people at Father’s house. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm
Jeannette Cockroft has reviewed Keira V. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:50 am
Should Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:47 am
Prah v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 2:49 am
The Supreme Court held that this practice was not unfavourable to disabled people, because it only applies to disabled people, therefore no comparison could be made with non-disabled people. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:57 am
s Baze v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:45 am
In Powell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am
On June 22, the Court also decided People v Henix, No 144531. [read post]
5 May 2015, 7:36 am
See, e.g., Young v. [read post]
