Search for: "People v. North" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Branker, No. 07-8 Denial of habeas petition challenging convictions for the murder of a state trooper and a deputy sheriff is affirmed where: 1) the Supreme Court of North Carolina did not unreasonably apply the clearly established federal law of Batson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Robert Elwyn Watkins v Philip James Woolas  [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB) 5 November 2010- read judgment The Election Court has ruled that the Labour MP for Oldham knowingly and deliberately misled the constituency and as a result his election is void under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act (1983). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:18 pm
As the Huntsville Times reported Friday, Huntsville, Alabama, mayor Tommy Battle says the city needs to support continued development of the Ares 1: Speaking to a sellout crowd of 1,300 people at the Von Braun Center’s North Hall, Battle said the Rocket City has to find a way to keep the Marshall Space Flight Center-managed program alive. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:01 pm by nflatow
In what is accurately hailed as a game-changing decision for the LGBT community, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled in April (Macy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
But here’s the key: “In all, more than 60,000 people—including 7,600 in North Carolina—were forcibly sterilized in the United States in the name of ‘progress. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 3:30 am by Jennifer Chacon
It also contains a discussion of the Court’s recognition of the need for special protections for young people in J.D.B. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
With so many long-suffering people now experiencing the unfamiliar (and probably uncomfortable) sensation of joy, it falls to the experts at Relist Watch to spring into action and bring back the reassuring embrace of disappointment. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
"The exercise of general jurisdiction over petitioners, simply because their products reached North Carolina through the stream of commerce, violates the due-process clause," the companies say. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:17 am by Ray Mullman
Don’t blame trial lawyers and create a false dichotomy of “business v. lawyers. [read post]