Search for: "Powers v. Ohio" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
  This post will discuss only one Section 230 ruling, the Bolger v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm by Bexis
Ohio May 4, 2010), is a spherical error. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am by Cameron Kerry
Databases had specified fields and analog information had to be entered in order to digitize it, and limits on computing power and data storage narrowed the choices of what data to collect and process. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
Metzenbaum's gun ban gains momentum In the late 1980s, the Senate's leading gun control advocate was Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
Click Here Hoosier Energy Agreement Marks 20th Settlement Under EPA’s Power Plant Enforcement Initiative. [read post]
 As the Ohio complaint states, “In sweeping terms, [the Rule] purports to extend federal regulatory jurisdiction over broad swaths of the country, including vast areas within the States of Ohio and Michigan, that in no way constitute navigable, potentially navigable, or interstate waters—even in various instances reaching land that is typically dry. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
The bottom line is that I don't think a voluntarily agreed cap on monetary damages makes monetary relief inadequate and if monetary damages are not inadequate, a court should not exercise its equitable powers to grant extraordinary permanent relief like specific performance. [read post]