Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 1941 - 1960 of 5,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2019, 10:19 am by Adam Feldman
When looking at this breakdown, we see that the court has been balanced or moved in the liberal direction in all areas aside from judicial power and unions. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bigler PDF Trust Lands for the Native Hawaiian Nation: Lessons from Federal Indian Law PrecedentsLane Kaiwi Opulauoho Comments PDF Indigenous Peoples, the International Trend Toward Legal Personhood for Nature, and the United StatesHannah White PDF Foundations of Sand: Justice Thomas’s Critique of the Indian Plenary Power DoctrineTaylor Ledford Notes <a href="https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Roosevelt was particularly upset by the Court’s 1935 decision in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:26 am by Joel Goldstein
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion, which Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer joined. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
This history also attains greater relevance in light of Justice Thomas’s recent troubling call for the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 5:08 am by Julian Davis Mortenson
For an example of the most important one, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:36 pm by Jennifer
Supreme Court interpreted the voting amendment as a broad command for gender equality in Adkins v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Yet the Court struck down an injunction against such leafleting: No prior decisions support the claim that the interest of an individual in being free from public criticism of his business practices in pamphlets or leaflets warrants use of the injunctive power of a court. [read post]