Search for: "Read v. United States of America" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:00 am by Carrie Cordero
(SSCI report p.5-6) In August 2007, Congress enacted the Protect America Act of 2007, an interim law. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 6:33 am by The Health Law Firm
Dale Munroe, No. 6:12-mj-1378 United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am by Stephen Dnes
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
” Virginia: The United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, on February 14, 2012, reversed the Eastern District of Virginia in a noncompete case (BP Products North America Incorporated v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:17 am
The Supreme Court's ruling this past summer in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Part I begins by placing the Administration’s proposal in context with the authority the Administration already claims under color of Article II of the Constitution of the United States as well as the 2001 AUMF directed at al Qaeda. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that prohibited California from enforcing AB 51, which was signed into law in 2019 (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:22 am by David Kopel
As of 1789, most indigenous people within the boundaries of the United States lived in non-State territories claimed by the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:28 pm by Lisa Ouellette
The Federal Circuit held that Helsinn's patents were invalid because Helsinn had sold the claimed invention to a distributor more than one year before filing for a patent, but Helsinn (supported by the United States as amicus) argues that the "on sale" bar is triggered only by sales that make the invention "available to the public" under a broad reading of "public. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by Steve Hall
"The parallel structure of the form in relation to aggravating and mitigating circumstances reads that findings as to each should be made similarly," Scirica wrote in the 32-page opinion in Abu-Jamal v. [read post]