Search for: "Roberts v. Brown"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:05 am
The result of respecting "private preferences" was essentially to lock in the status quo.In 1968, the Supreme Court, in Green v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:50 am
(For upcoming transnational cases, see below.)Yesterday's plurality opinion invalidating programs designed to maintain racially integrated public schools relied on Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:59 pm
There is much to be said about the uses of history in today's important case, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
Whereas Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
Whereas Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
There is a cruel irony in THE CHIEF JUSTICE.s reliance on our decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:47 am
" The Chief Justice, in his oral announcement of the ruling, insisted that the Court was remaining faithful to Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 8:15 am
" The Chief Justice, in his oral announcement of the ruling, insisted that the Court was remaining faithful to Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:08 am
By comparison, on this history, George Wallace became the person who best understood that the central principle of BROWN v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 3:59 am
As Mike anticipated in his earlier post, Chief Justice Roberts does indeed use Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Roberts, Jr., wrote the majority opinion in the combined cases.MORE: From SCOTUSblog:The Chief Justice, in his oral announcement of the ruling, insisted that the Court was remaining faithful to Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 11:41 pm
During the oral argument, CJ Roberts suggested that Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
" Lisa Browning and Ronald Browning v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:30 pm
Of course, this mess all started with the investigation into certain actions of NASA IG Robert Cobb. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
Wyner - "a perfect example of what John Roberts is trying to achieve in his efforts to move the Court toward consensus. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
At least as far as I'm aware, in the past, when clerks and others have given tidbits to the press, they have waited until after the relevant case came down, and even then they do so anonymously because this is a clear violation of their obligation of confidentiality.Accordingly, I'm going with theory number 1, which has the virtue of making it possible to think that the consensus is wrong, and thus that there's still a chance that the Court won't overrule Brown… [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 10:19 am
The Download of the Week is Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash by Robert Post and Reva Siegel. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 5:06 am
Accommodating resistance to Roe thus presents normative questions analogous to those posed by accommodating resistance to Brown. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:45 pm
The Court majority in Uttecht v. [read post]
