Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 6,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Attorney Jeff Sessions. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:28 am
In order to use the MFP, a user must first log in using an IC card to start a "user session"; see [149]. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 4:58 am
Prashant Bhushan, Advocate in Mohammad Salimullah v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at the legal challenges to the appointment of Matthew Whitaker as deputy attorney general, including one that “comes in the guise of Michaels v Sessions, a case challenging the federal ban on guns for convicted felons that has seen its caption change to Michaels v Whitaker” during the cert petition stage. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 2:45 pm
Anti-abortion politicians wasted no time going after Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:59 am
However, in 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
The three sessions can be watched on the Supreme Court website. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 2:47 pm
With the House flip to the Democrats, I wonder if FOSTA could have navigated the upcoming Congress session–despite the overwhelming bipartisan support it drew in the last session. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Justices of the Supreme Court of Texas convened a special session of the court on Wednesday to honor judges and governors who served in the armed forces during the Great War. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:15 am
Finally, as a general rule, emergency meetings may not be held in closed session. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
Engel also cites the Supreme Court’s 1898 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 2:48 am
The Supreme Court held that “financially independent” in s 117B(3) means “not financially dependent upon the state”. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
United States and Intercollegiate Broadcasting Systems Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am
Next, the government cites United States v. [read post]
