Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
In addition, the authority of local and state regulatory agencies will be usurped by the U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
., Ltd v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:23 am
DiLazaro, et al. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
shutterstock/rawpixel “hands holding bubbles with social media words” This case addresses whether social media accounts used in connection with a business become property of the bankruptcy estate. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm
Where the Legal Fight Against FOSTA Stands Now With the case now back in district court after the D.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:52 pm
See US Bank National Association, v Flatbush Extension LLC, et al., Index No. 26434/09. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Prior attempts to measure tarnishment: Buccafusco et al 2016 focused on porn parodies, found burnishing except among very conservative consumers. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:37 pm
WO 01/08661 to Maloney ("Maloney"), both alone and in combination with United States Patent No. 5,047,248 to Calanchi et al. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Trying to nullify state capture. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
V. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Michael Whitten, et al., 2010 U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Dotson et al, Brand Attitudes and Search Engine Queries, 37 J. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
” State ex reI. 2 Dunlap v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Bar and the State Bar of New York. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Abaclat v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
The state has a long-standing role as parens patriae. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 8:39 am
The state has a long-standing role as parens patriae. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am
Carron, Case Review of the 5Pointz Appeal: Castillo et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133 (argued February 27, 2013) and 3) offers of judgment under FRCP Rule 68 in Fair Labor Standards Act collective actions and the effect on FRCP Rule 23 class actions (Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
