Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2009, 4:53 am
MIESCH, ET AL.; from Refugio County; 13th district (13-00-00104-CV, 180 SW3d 299,11-29-05) The Court reverses and renders judgment, in part, and affirms, in part, the court of appeals' judgment,and remands the case to the trial court.Justice Wainwright delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:30 pm
Political Punch: Obama Administration Maintains Bush Position on ‘Extraordinary Rendition’ Lawsuit [via Glenn Greenwald] The Obama Administration today announced that it would keep the same position as the Bush Administration in the lawsuit Mohamed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:19 am
Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 08-472 Title: Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, et al., v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
On December 24, 2008, Baweja filed this Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for David Lubocki, et al. pursuant to California Rules of Professional Conduct 3-300 and 3-310. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:02 pm
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, [www.abanet.org] VAN DE KAMP, JOHN, ET AL. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:30 pm
Eurodif, S.A. et al, together with No. 07-1078, USEC Inc. et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  Roberts et al. came down with one decision, Pearson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:53 am
 Obama, et al., Keyes alleges that Obama has failed to sufficiently document that he is a "natural born" citizen. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At 11 a.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Vermont v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]