Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE" Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Benson stating that “[t]ransformation and reduction of an article ‘to a different state or thing’ is the clue to the patentability of a process claim that does not include particular machines. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Benson stating that “[t]ransformation and reduction of an article ‘to a different state or thing’ is the clue to the patentability of a process claim that does not include particular machines. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
 | Justice Slade delivers judgement in Arthur J Gallagher Services v Skriptchenko Never too late 99 [week ending on Sunday 5 June] German Constitutional Court sends sampling saga into another loop | Who should pay for the independence of the Boards of Appeal? [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court decision regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
That's just one of those coincidences that surprises us as much as those who arrive here searching for interesting stuff on the worldwide web.The title of Peter Black's law blog, Freedom to Differ, is inspired by the Opinion of the US Supreme Court in Board of Education v Barnette 319 US 624 (1943), a case concerning the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution that protected students from being forced to salute the American flag and say… [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Using these opinions as a sample, instead of choosing a random sample, offers the opportunity to either agree with the justices’ assessment of their work or challenge it. [read post]