Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 21,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:02 am by Jon Sands
Holder, 759 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014), the state statute is divisible under Deschamps and a modified categorical approach could be used.US v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm by John W. Arden
’s motion to dismiss trademark infringement and dilution claims brought by the Navajo Nation (The Navajo Nation v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:10 pm by James M. Beard
Building the F/V American Finest in the United States was a feel good story about supporting American shipbuilding and the American fisheries. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:10 pm by James M. Beard
Building the F/V American Finest in the United States was a feel good story about supporting American shipbuilding and the American fisheries. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:15 pm
 Well, since the US Supreme Court kindly timed their publication of yesterday's ruling in Kirtsaeng v Wiley to coincide with IPKat team member Eleonora's blogpost here, the name, and the issue of "first sale" (a.k.a. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 8:10 am by Dean Freeman
The two were at an out-of-state sales conference, of which the golf game was reportedly a part. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC. v Rivkin Radler LLP,  .2018 NY Slip Op 32913(U)  November 13, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 505978/18 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman is an example of what happens when a doctor to doctor business sale goes wrong. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:15 am by Ernie Svenson
The United States Supreme Court just heard arguments on the question of whether California's law banning the sale of excessively violent video games is constitutional. [read post]