Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2014, 4:14 pm
That happened today in the argument of Jeff Fisher for the petitioner in Heien v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
United States is that the Court is free to rule on substantive Fourth Amendment issues even when there is no remedy. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:50 am
United States, No. 13-7451, in which the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley act's prohibition against the destruction of evidence applies to a fisherman who tossed a couple of allegedly undersized red grouper overboard before federal agents could seize the piscatorial evidence. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Like Chief Justice Roberts during oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
§ 17C-15-18(a)(1); State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
And yet I took the job.And swore the oath set forth in 28 USC § 453.Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, XXX XXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as XXX under the… [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:52 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 577–79 (2003), and United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:10 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
United States, a petition scheduled for the Court’s September 29 Conference. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:16 pm
Last month I commenced a series of posts of the United States Supreme Court’s labor and employment law decisions last term by blogging on the Court’s decision in the First Amendment public employee free speech case of Lane v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 9:42 am
The judgement of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:51 am
What is not obvious to all is whether the United States Supreme Court will agree that anyone can be forced to abide by such restrictions consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 1:20 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm
UPDATE: In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
While many of these provisions are consistent with the laws of Bangladesh, several key provisions are drawn from either the law of the United States or norms included in a number of international treaties (only some of which have been ratified or incorporated into the laws of either the United and or Bangladesh). [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
