Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2015, 12:00 pm
In opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by CVS, the relator cited Yarberry v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:34 pm
We prefer pharmacies in the latter category – sellers of products. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm
Perfect price discrimination is only theoretically possible since the seller must know each buyer’s reservation price (the maximum they will pay) and individualize an offer to them at that price, thus not leaving any potential revenues uncaptured. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am
LG Electronics, Inc. overruled the Federal Circuit’s precedent Mallinckrodt Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
In the recent case of Pritchett v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:16 pm
The decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
FTC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
On February 12, 2015, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Sundberg v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
The Facts as Alleged by the Plaintiff In the case of Williams v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:45 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2001) (use in ads suggesting endorsement of clothing seller); Brown v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 8:11 am
In Rams Gate Winery, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:47 pm
In the case of Reckis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
The controlling case is Robak v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:52 pm
Ct. 2304, 2313 (2013) (Kagan, dissenting); Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Courts and regulators provided some clarification (in Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am
United States last Term.) [read post]
