Search for: "Sells v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 14,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
While there are statutory exceptions that vary slightly from state to state, generally the government is shielded from legal action in the event that one of its representatives is found liable in a claim. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
United States ,1944 An article in the Washington Post on court nominees refusing to answer questions about Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications - the Ninth Circuit held the Sherman Antitrust Act permits "price squeeze" claims against companies with no duty to sell to others at wholesale. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In January 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:12 am by Eric
First, it refuses to embrace the Perfect 10 v. ccBill conclusion that 230 preempts state IP claims, but it doesn't accept the alternative proposition (from the Project Playlist and Friendfinder cases) either. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:13 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Native Wholesale Supply Company v. [read post]