Search for: "Sharp v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Wednesday 11 December 2024, the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Nicola Davies and Dingemans LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Prismall v Google [2024] EWCA Civ 1516. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:11 pm by Lawrence Solum
Sharpe in which the Supreme Court applied the substance of the equal protection clause to the federal government—even though it is unmistakably clear that the 14th amendment applies only to the state. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 8:38 am by Lawrence Solum
Sharpe in which the Supreme Court applied the substance of the equal protection clause to the federal government—even though it is unmistakably clear that the 14th amendment applies only to the state. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
  That vessel permits a broad scope of discretionary decisions whether or not in conformity to expectations that is protected by international law, or, more specifically, by the structural nature of the state system with its ideology that states can do no wrong unless they are (eventually--and rarely) brought to account by other states. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Developments PTY Limited v Mccreight [2024] SADC 149. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer… [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:51 pm by Darren O'Donovan
Events in Eastern Europe have yielded some sharp practice relating to the interaction of IMF requested austerity measures and national Constitutional Courts. [read post]
17 May 2008, 5:14 pm
The California Supreme Court relied on its own decision invalidating an anti-miscegenation law, Perez v. [read post]