Search for: "State of Delaware v. Wells."
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:58 pm
Voyager Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Wells Fargo, relying on TSC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 6:50 am
Because this blog focuses on Delaware law, the only point I want to highlight in this 24-page decision is a footnote that reiterates basic Delaware law to the effect that forum clauses are generally upheld, but even as here where the law of another state is applied to the substantive dispute, Delaware procedural and remedial law will still govern. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 2:54 pm
The Court distinguished Topps and Ryan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Terri Cole v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Politano, No. 06-2342 Sentence above the guidelines range for engaging in a business of dealing firearms without a license is affirmed where the district court: 1) acted well within its discretion in finding defendant's likelihood of recidivism was underestimated in the sentencing guidelines; and 2) properly considered the seriousness of the crime, need for deterrence, and defendant's likelihood of recidivism within its discussion of section 3553(a) sentencing factors. . [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:35 pm
(Here is a link to summaries on this blog of both the Chancery Court's decision in the foregoing case as well as a link to the Delaware Supreme Court's opinion affirming, as cited above.)He discusses the broader implications of the doctrine in the context of the "tug of war" between and among Delaware and the federal government--and other states--for preeminence in the governance of corporate law issues. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 9:35 pm
Indeed, given the recent New Jersey v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:44 pm
Korn v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:30 am
Delaware illustrates that home state bias may not be entirely a thing of the past. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
V. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:46 am
On Wednesday, March 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
" [17] Van Gorkom The next case is Smith v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 12:09 pm
In Jana Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:39 am
United States, 79 Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Stine v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:26 am
(Portnoy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:10 am
Schoon v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
