Search for: "State v. English"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm
A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:07 pm
Oct. 16, 2008) In United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
In State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Mauldin et al.[10] It was argued on the basis of the “full appreciation” test stated by the Court of Appeal in Combined Air Mechanical v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:00 am
Render v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23 – 24 February 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc; and Belmont Park Investments PTY Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc, heard 1 – 3 March 2011. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Comment This was an ambitious appeal and its outcome is unsurprising given the weight carried by the open justice principle in English law. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:01 am
” [Deutsch v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
Prosecution history estoppel has not been applied in English proceedings, and it remains to be seen whether that will change in light of Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
V & J Foods, Inc., No. 07-1009 (7th Cir. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:05 am
Mr Justice Birss observed in Illumina v MGI that a limiting definition of a feature in the description, limits the scope of the claim. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:30 am
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Subar v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:20 am
The title of the seminar is a reference to Saint Crispin’s Day, and the Saint Crispin’s Day speech from Shakespeare’s Henry V; in Henry V, Henry gave a rallying speech to the outnumbered English forces in the Battle of Agincourt. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:17 pm
Mortgage Bankers Association v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
This is due to the deliberate legislative choice, attaching significance in English law to testamentary freedom. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:50 am
The English Court of Appeal in a June 2018 judgment confirmed the principles relating to informed consent in medical malpractice claims. [read post]
