Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 1941 - 1960 of 29,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
The problem: TC Heartland defines residence at the state level, but 1400(b) requires a district-by-district focus — “the judicial district where the defendant resides. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:29 pm
United States (No. 08-108), argued earlier this Term, Nijhawan v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
But the First Amendment is quite clear that a state may enforce a neutral law of general applicability in Employment Div. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
State law Claims: The court dismisses the state law claims on preemption grounds. __ Is this Oracle v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:23 am by Gritsforbreakfast
These recommendations would restore allocations to current budget levels for many programs. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
  Why, might you ask, is the State arguing for a heightened level of intent? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 9:13 am by Steve Hall
This is the lowest level of support since 1972, the year the Supreme Court voided all existing state death penalty laws in Furman v. [read post]