Search for: "State v. Pass "
Results 1941 - 1960
of 25,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law § 297[9] and the… [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:36 pm
The state Legislature passed a law earlier this year exempting execution procedures from the law. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:05 am
See State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:37 am
As detailed in this SCOTUSblog post, the Ninth Circuit decided on Thursday to "put on hold its consideration of a case testing whether the Second Amendment right 'to keep and bear arms' restricts laws passed by state and local governments. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:59 pm
Arkansas, for example, passed a law expelling all free Black residents of the state. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 3:59 pm
Arkansas, for example, passed a law expelling all free Black residents of the state. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
United States, 585 U.S. [read post]
23 May 2009, 4:05 am
"Well, my old colleague and mentor would probably be pleased about the United States Supreme Court's decision this past week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
The constitutional question in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:08 pm
The cert petition in Stevenson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:56 am
” Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:26 pm
The case, Grants Pass v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:58 pm
North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 2:16 pm
Supreme Court decision of Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:31 pm
Estey J. noted in passing that the purpose of the deposit “was clear and simple . . . . [read post]
